Kõik hakkavad suhteliselt vaikselt ülesannet vihikusse kirjutama, kui tagumisest pingist tuleb teade: "Õpetaja, mul on vedru kadunud!" Kui õpetaja oleks professionaalne ja järjekindel pedagoog, lahendaks ta vedruprobleemi suurema kärata ära, mitte ei hakkaks ise naerma (probleem ju täiesti tõsine). Aga midagi pole teha, kõik lihtsalt ei ole professionaalsed ja järjekindlad pedagoogid ja sel hetkel tundub lause ikka üle mõistuse naljakas. Loomulikult hakkab lõbus ka ülejäänud klassil ja maha rahunemine võtab pisut aega. Lõpuks leidub ka üks vedruga pastakas ja kõik saavad kirjutamist jätkata. Hiljem selgub, et segastel asjaoludel võivad ära kaduda ka näiteks otsad ja üleüldse igasugused muud asjad loomulikult ka.
Hypothetical situation: an ATM was robbed in Küüni Street. There are two suspects and fourteen detectives.
The first suspect enters. HE looks incredibly happy.
Ds: Where were you yesterday between 6 and 8 o'clock?
S1: I was in Lõunakeskus with /the name of the other suspect/.
Ds: What were you doing there?
S1: We were in Tiimari. We were looking at teddy bears.
Ds (quite happily): Did you buy anything?
S1 (even more happily): No. We were just looking.
Ds: Did you go to any other shop?
S1 (laughing): No, we were looking at the teddy bears in Tiimari. We are fans of teddy bears.
Ds: Which was /the name of the other suspect/'s favourite teddy bear?
S1 (triumphantly): He liked the pink ones of course. We were looking only at the pink teddy bears!
And so on and so on. After getting a lot of completely irrelevant information, the panel of detectives decides that the suspects are terribly guilty. And everyone is happy. Me included - how else can you make them ask questions in the past simple tense?
2 comments:
Ha-ha-haa! "Mul on vedru kadunud."
Mul vist ongi :P
Vaata, et sa siis kogemata otsa ka ära ei kaota :p
NB! Kõige kindlam on endale soetada säänne pastakas, millel selliseid vidinaid lihtsalt ei olegi :p Või noh, pigem on vist nii, et kui tal on üks, siis tal pole teist. Whatever :D
Post a Comment